YES Termination proof of rt1-2.trs

(0) Obligation:

Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

f(x) → x
g(x) → x

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

f(x) → g(x)
g(x) → f(x)

(1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(f(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(g(x1)) = 1 + x1   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly:
Rules from R:

f(x) → x
g(x) → x
Rules from S:
none


(2) Obligation:

Relative term rewrite system:
R is empty.
The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

f(x) → g(x)
g(x) → f(x)

(3) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) YES