YES Termination proof of invNSS03.trs

(0) Obligation:

Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

f(x, 0) → s(x)
g(x) → h(x, gen)
h(0, x) → f(x, x)
ab

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

gens(gen)

(1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
f(x1, x2)  =  f(x1, x2)
0  =  0
s(x1)  =  x1
g(x1)  =  g(x1)
h(x1, x2)  =  h(x1, x2)
gen  =  gen
a  =  a
b  =  b

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
g1 > h2 > [f2, 0]
g1 > gen > [f2, 0]
a > b > [f2, 0]

Status:
f2: multiset
0: multiset
g1: multiset
h2: [2,1]
gen: multiset
a: multiset
b: multiset

With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly:
Rules from R:

f(x, 0) → s(x)
g(x) → h(x, gen)
h(0, x) → f(x, x)
ab
Rules from S:
none


(2) Obligation:

Relative term rewrite system:
R is empty.
The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

gens(gen)

(3) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) YES