YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  +(x,|0|()) -> x
  +(|0|(),x) -> x
  +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
  *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
  *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
  *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
  sum(nil()) -> |0|()
  sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
  prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
  prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p2: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(*(x,y),+(x,y))
p3: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> *#(x,y)
p4: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)
p5: sum#(cons(x,l)) -> +#(x,sum(l))
p6: sum#(cons(x,l)) -> sum#(l)
p7: prod#(cons(x,l)) -> *#(x,prod(l))
p8: prod#(cons(x,l)) -> prod#(l)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r6: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r7: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r8: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r9: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r10: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p6}
  {p8}
  {p3}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: sum#(cons(x,l)) -> sum#(l)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r6: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r7: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r8: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r9: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r10: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        sum# > cons
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(sum#) = [1]
        pi(cons) = 2
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        cons > sum#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(sum#) = [1]
        pi(cons) = [2]
    
    3. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        cons > sum#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(sum#) = []
        pi(cons) = 2
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: prod#(cons(x,l)) -> prod#(l)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r6: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r7: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r8: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r9: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r10: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        prod# > cons
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(prod#) = [1]
        pi(cons) = 2
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        cons > prod#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(prod#) = [1]
        pi(cons) = [2]
    
    3. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        cons > prod#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(prod#) = []
        pi(cons) = 2
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: *#(s(x),s(y)) -> *#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r6: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r7: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r8: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r9: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r10: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > *#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(*#) = 1
        pi(s) = [1]
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > *#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(*#) = 1
        pi(s) = 1
    
    3. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > *#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(*#) = 1
        pi(s) = [1]
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(s(x),s(y)) -> +#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: +(x,|0|()) -> x
r2: +(|0|(),x) -> x
r3: +(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(+(x,y)))
r4: *(x,|0|()) -> |0|()
r5: *(|0|(),x) -> |0|()
r6: *(s(x),s(y)) -> s(+(*(x,y),+(x,y)))
r7: sum(nil()) -> |0|()
r8: sum(cons(x,l)) -> +(x,sum(l))
r9: prod(nil()) -> s(|0|())
r10: prod(cons(x,l)) -> *(x,prod(l))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > +#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(+#) = 1
        pi(s) = [1]
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > +#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(+#) = 1
        pi(s) = 1
    
    3. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > +#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(+#) = 1
        pi(s) = [1]
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.