YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  +(-(x,y),z) -> -(+(x,z),y)
  -(+(x,y),y) -> x

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(-(x,y),z) -> -#(+(x,z),y)
p2: +#(-(x,y),z) -> +#(x,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(-(x,y),z) -> -(+(x,z),y)
r2: -(+(x,y),y) -> x

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: +#(-(x,y),z) -> +#(x,z)

and R consists of:

r1: +(-(x,y),z) -> -(+(x,z),y)
r2: -(+(x,y),y) -> x

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        - > +#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(+#) = [1]
        pi(-) = [1, 2]
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        - > +#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(+#) = [1]
        pi(-) = [1, 2]
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.