YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
  g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
  g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(x,y) -> g#(x,y)
p2: g#(h(x),y) -> f#(x,y)
p3: g#(h(x),y) -> g#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
r2: g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
r3: g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(x,y) -> g#(x,y)
p2: g#(h(x),y) -> g#(x,y)
p3: g#(h(x),y) -> f#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
r2: g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
r3: g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        g# > f# > h
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(f#) = 1
        pi(g#) = 1
        pi(h) = [1]
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        g# > f# > h
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(f#) = 1
        pi(g#) = 1
        pi(h) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p2, p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(x,y) -> g#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
r2: g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
r3: g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)