YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
  app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
  app(app(le(),|0|()),y) -> true()
  app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> false()
  app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(le(),x),y)
  app(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(maxlist(),y),ys))
  app(app(maxlist(),x),nil()) -> x
  app(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app(s(),app(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs)))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
p2: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(cons(),app(f,x))
p3: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p4: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),f),xs)
p5: app#(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app#(app(le(),x),y)
p6: app#(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app#(le(),x)
p7: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(maxlist(),y),ys))
p8: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(if(),app(app(le(),x),y))
p9: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(app(le(),x),y)
p10: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(le(),x)
p11: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(app(maxlist(),y),ys)
p12: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(maxlist(),y)
p13: app#(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app#(s(),app(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs)))
p14: app#(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs))
p15: app#(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app#(maxlist(),|0|())
p16: app#(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),height()),xs)
p17: app#(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app#(map(),height())

and R consists of:

r1: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r2: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
r3: app(app(le(),|0|()),y) -> true()
r4: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> false()
r5: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(le(),x),y)
r6: app(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(maxlist(),y),ys))
r7: app(app(maxlist(),x),nil()) -> x
r8: app(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app(s(),app(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3, p4, p16}
  {p11}
  {p5}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(f,x)
p2: app#(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),height()),xs)
p3: app#(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app#(app(map(),f),xs)

and R consists of:

r1: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r2: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
r3: app(app(le(),|0|()),y) -> true()
r4: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> false()
r5: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(le(),x),y)
r6: app(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(maxlist(),y),ys))
r7: app(app(maxlist(),x),nil()) -> x
r8: app(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app(s(),app(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        app > app# > node > map > height > cons
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(app#) = [1, 2]
        pi(app) = [1, 2]
        pi(map) = []
        pi(cons) = []
        pi(height) = []
        pi(node) = []
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        app#_A(x1,x2) = 0
        app_A(x1,x2) = 1
        map_A() = 1
        cons_A() = 0
        height_A() = 1
        node_A() = 0
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2, p3

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app#(app(maxlist(),y),ys)

and R consists of:

r1: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r2: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
r3: app(app(le(),|0|()),y) -> true()
r4: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> false()
r5: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(le(),x),y)
r6: app(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(maxlist(),y),ys))
r7: app(app(maxlist(),x),nil()) -> x
r8: app(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app(s(),app(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        app > maxlist > app# > cons
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(app#) = 2
        pi(app) = [2]
        pi(maxlist) = []
        pi(cons) = []
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        app#_A(x1,x2) = x2
        app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
        maxlist_A() = 0
        cons_A() = 0
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: app#(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app#(app(le(),x),y)

and R consists of:

r1: app(app(map(),f),nil()) -> nil()
r2: app(app(map(),f),app(app(cons(),x),xs)) -> app(app(cons(),app(f,x)),app(app(map(),f),xs))
r3: app(app(le(),|0|()),y) -> true()
r4: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),|0|()) -> false()
r5: app(app(le(),app(s(),x)),app(s(),y)) -> app(app(le(),x),y)
r6: app(app(maxlist(),x),app(app(cons(),y),ys)) -> app(app(if(),app(app(le(),x),y)),app(app(maxlist(),y),ys))
r7: app(app(maxlist(),x),nil()) -> x
r8: app(height(),app(app(node(),x),xs)) -> app(s(),app(app(maxlist(),|0|()),app(app(map(),height()),xs)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > app > le > app#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(app#) = 2
        pi(app) = [1, 2]
        pi(le) = []
        pi(s) = []
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        app#_A(x1,x2) = x2
        app_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
        le_A() = 1
        s_A() = 1
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.