YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        div# > s > |0| > quot#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(div#) = 1
        pi(quot#) = 1
        pi(|0|) = []
        pi(s) = [1]
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        div#_A(x1,x2) = x1
        quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1
        |0|_A() = 1
        s_A(x1) = x1 + 1
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        |0| > s > div# > quot#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(div#) = 2
        pi(quot#) = 2
        pi(|0|) = []
        pi(s) = []
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        div#_A(x1,x2) = 1
        quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = 0
        |0|_A() = 1
        s_A(x1) = 1
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.