YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
  f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
  f(X,X) -> c(X)

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(X),X) -> f#(X,a(X))
p2: f#(X,c(X)) -> f#(s(X),X)

and R consists of:

r1: f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
r2: f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
r3: f(X,X) -> c(X)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(X,c(X)) -> f#(s(X),X)

and R consists of:

r1: f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
r2: f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
r3: f(X,X) -> c(X)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic path order with precedence:
  
    precedence:
    
      s > f# > c
    
    argument filter:
  
      pi(f#) = 2
      pi(c) = [1]
      pi(s) = 1

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(X),X) -> f#(X,a(X))

and R consists of:

r1: f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
r2: f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
r3: f(X,X) -> c(X)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the monotone reduction pair:

  lexicographic path order with precedence:
  
    precedence:
    
      s > a > f#
    
    argument filter:
  
      pi(f#) = [1, 2]
      pi(s) = [1]
      pi(a) = [1]

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1
  r1, r2, r3

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.