YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
  f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
  f(X,X) -> c(X)

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(X),X) -> f#(X,a(X))
p2: f#(X,c(X)) -> f#(s(X),X)

and R consists of:

r1: f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
r2: f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
r3: f(X,X) -> c(X)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(X,c(X)) -> f#(s(X),X)

and R consists of:

r1: f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
r2: f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
r3: f(X,X) -> c(X)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  matrix interpretations:
  
    carrier: N^4
    order: lexicographic order
    interpretations:
      f#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,0,1)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0),(1,1,0,0)) x2
      c_A(x1) = ((1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,1,1,0)) x1 + (2,1,1,1)
      s_A(x1) = ((1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,1,1)) x1 + (1,1,4,2)

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(X),X) -> f#(X,a(X))

and R consists of:

r1: f(s(X),X) -> f(X,a(X))
r2: f(X,c(X)) -> f(s(X),X)
r3: f(X,X) -> c(X)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  matrix interpretations:
  
    carrier: N^4
    order: lexicographic order
    interpretations:
      f#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(0,1,0,1)) x2
      s_A(x1) = ((1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,1,1,0)) x1 + (2,1,1,1)
      a_A(x1) = ((0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0)) x1 + (1,1,3,3)

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.