YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  half(|0|()) -> |0|()
  half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
  log(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
  log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(half(x))))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: half#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x)
p2: log#(s(s(x))) -> log#(s(half(x)))
p3: log#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r3: log(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r4: log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(half(x))))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p2}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: log#(s(s(x))) -> log#(s(half(x)))

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r3: log(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r4: log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(half(x))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2

Take the reduction pair:

  matrix interpretations:
  
    carrier: N^2
    order: lexicographic order
    interpretations:
      log#_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1
      s_A(x1) = x1 + (2,2)
      half_A(x1) = x1 + (1,1)
      |0|_A() = (1,2)

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: half#(s(s(x))) -> half#(x)

and R consists of:

r1: half(|0|()) -> |0|()
r2: half(s(s(x))) -> s(half(x))
r3: log(s(|0|())) -> |0|()
r4: log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(half(x))))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  matrix interpretations:
  
    carrier: N^2
    order: lexicographic order
    interpretations:
      half#_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,0)) x1
      s_A(x1) = ((1,0),(1,1)) x1 + (1,1)

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.