YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(f(x)) -> f(g(f(x),x))
  f(f(x)) -> f(h(f(x),f(x)))
  g(x,y) -> y
  h(x,x) -> g(x,|0|())

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(f(x)) -> f#(g(f(x),x))
p2: f#(f(x)) -> g#(f(x),x)
p3: f#(f(x)) -> f#(h(f(x),f(x)))
p4: f#(f(x)) -> h#(f(x),f(x))
p5: h#(x,x) -> g#(x,|0|())

and R consists of:

r1: f(f(x)) -> f(g(f(x),x))
r2: f(f(x)) -> f(h(f(x),f(x)))
r3: g(x,y) -> y
r4: h(x,x) -> g(x,|0|())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(f(x)) -> f#(g(f(x),x))
p2: f#(f(x)) -> f#(h(f(x),f(x)))

and R consists of:

r1: f(f(x)) -> f(g(f(x),x))
r2: f(f(x)) -> f(h(f(x),f(x)))
r3: g(x,y) -> y
r4: h(x,x) -> g(x,|0|())

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        f#_A(x1) = x1
        f_A(x1) = x1 + 3
        g_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
        h_A(x1,x2) = 2
        |0|_A() = 0
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        |0| > g > f > h > f#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(f#) = 1
        pi(f) = [1]
        pi(g) = 2
        pi(h) = []
        pi(|0|) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.