YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  plus(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus(X,plus(s(s(Y)),Z))
  plus(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus(X1,plus(X3,plus(X2,X4)))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus#(X,plus(s(s(Y)),Z))
p2: plus#(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus#(s(s(Y)),Z)
p3: plus#(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus#(X1,plus(X3,plus(X2,X4)))
p4: plus#(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus#(X3,plus(X2,X4))
p5: plus#(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus#(X2,X4)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus(X,plus(s(s(Y)),Z))
r2: plus(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus(X1,plus(X3,plus(X2,X4)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4, p5}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: plus#(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus#(X,plus(s(s(Y)),Z))
p2: plus#(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus#(X2,X4)
p3: plus#(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus#(X3,plus(X2,X4))
p4: plus#(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus#(X1,plus(X3,plus(X2,X4)))
p5: plus#(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus#(s(s(Y)),Z)

and R consists of:

r1: plus(s(X),plus(Y,Z)) -> plus(X,plus(s(s(Y)),Z))
r2: plus(s(X1),plus(X2,plus(X3,X4))) -> plus(X1,plus(X3,plus(X2,X4)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        plus#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
        s_A(x1) = x1
        plus_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        plus > s > plus#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(plus#) = 1
        pi(s) = [1]
        pi(plus) = [2]
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2, p3, p4, p5

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.