YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
  g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
  g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(f(x,y),z) -> g#(y,z)
p2: g#(h(x,y),z) -> g#(x,f(y,z))
p3: g#(x,h(y,z)) -> g#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
r2: g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
r3: g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: g#(f(x,y),z) -> g#(y,z)
p2: g#(x,h(y,z)) -> g#(x,y)
p3: g#(h(x,y),z) -> g#(x,f(y,z))

and R consists of:

r1: g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
r2: g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
r3: g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the monotone reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        g#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
        f_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
        h_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        g#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2
        f_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
        h_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 2
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2, p3
  r1, r2, r3

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.