YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  and(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and(y,band(x,z),x)

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: and#(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and#(y,band(x,z),x)

and R consists of:

r1: and(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and(y,band(x,z),x)

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: and#(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and#(y,band(x,z),x)

and R consists of:

r1: and(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and(y,band(x,z),x)

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        and#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2 + x3
        not_A(x1) = x1 + 1
        band_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 1
    
    2. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^1
      order: standard order
      interpretations:
        and#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x2 + x3
        not_A(x1) = 1
        band_A(x1,x2) = x2 + 2
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.