YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
  quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
  quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
  quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)
p3: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))
p3: quot#(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot#(x,y,z)

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  matrix interpretations:
  
    carrier: N^1
    order: standard order
    interpretations:
      div#_A(x1,x2) = x1
      quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1
      |0|_A() = 1
      s_A(x1) = x1 + 1

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p3

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: div#(x,y) -> quot#(x,y,y)
p2: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  matrix interpretations:
  
    carrier: N^1
    order: standard order
    interpretations:
      div#_A(x1,x2) = x1 + x2 + 1
      quot#_A(x1,x2,x3) = x1 + x2
      |0|_A() = 2
      s_A(x1) = 1

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: quot#(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> div#(x,s(z))

and R consists of:

r1: div(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r2: div(x,y) -> quot(x,y,y)
r3: quot(|0|(),s(y),z) -> |0|()
r4: quot(s(x),s(y),z) -> quot(x,y,z)
r5: quot(x,|0|(),s(z)) -> s(div(x,s(z)))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  (no SCCs)