YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Transformed_CSR_04_PEANO_nokinds_noand_GM.ari

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳9 YES
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 43 ms)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳16 YES

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__U12(a__isNat(V2))
A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__U21(a__isNat(V1))
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__ISNAT(M)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → A__U12(mark(X))
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isNat(X)) → A__ISNAT(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → A__U21(mark(X))
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 9 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U12(X) → U12(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 2

  • A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
    The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 1

  • A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( A__PLUS(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + x2 + 1

POL( A__U31(x1, x2) ) = x2 + 1

POL( A__U41(x1, ..., x3) ) = x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( A__U42(x1, ..., x3) ) = x1 + x2 + 2x3 + 1

POL( mark(x1) ) = x1

POL( U11(x1, x2) ) = x1

POL( a__U11(x1, x2) ) = x1

POL( U12(x1) ) = x1

POL( a__U12(x1) ) = x1

POL( isNat(x1) ) = 1

POL( a__isNat(x1) ) = 1

POL( U21(x1) ) = x1

POL( a__U21(x1) ) = x1

POL( U31(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2

POL( a__U31(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2

POL( tt ) = 1

POL( plus(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 2x2 + 1

POL( a__plus(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 2x2 + 1

POL( 0 ) = 2

POL( U41(x1, ..., x3) ) = x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( a__U41(x1, ..., x3) ) = x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( U42(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 + 1

POL( a__U42(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 + 1

POL( s(x1) ) = x1 + 1

POL( MARK(x1) ) = x1 + 1


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 2

  • A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
    The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 1

  • MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(16) YES