YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Transformed_CSR_04_PEANO_nokinds-noand_Z.ari

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳4 QDP
↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 49 ms)
↳6 QDP
↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳8 QDP
↳9 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳10 QDP
↳11 PisEmptyProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳12 YES

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V2) → U121(isNat(activate(V2)))
U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → U421(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U421(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U421(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U211(isNat(activate(V1)))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(isNat(N), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(isNat(M), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 01
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(isNat(N), N)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(isNat(M), M, N)
U411(tt, M, N) → U421(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U421(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U411(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
U311(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U421(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U421(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U411(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U411(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( ISNAT(x1) ) = 2x1 + 1

POL( PLUS(x1, x2) ) = max{0, 2x1 + 2x2 - 2}

POL( U111(x1, x2) ) = 2x2 + 1

POL( U311(x1, x2) ) = 2x2 + 2

POL( U411(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( U421(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x1 + 2x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( activate(x1) ) = x1

POL( n__0 ) = 2

POL( 0 ) = 2

POL( n__plus(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 2x2

POL( plus(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 2x2

POL( U31(x1, x2) ) = 2x2 + 2

POL( isNat(x1) ) = 0

POL( tt ) = 0

POL( n__s(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( s(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( U11(x1, x2) ) = max{0, -2}

POL( U12(x1) ) = max{0, -2}

POL( U21(x1) ) = max{0, -2}

POL( U41(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( U42(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x2 + 2x3 + 2

POL( ACTIVATE(x1) ) = 2x1 + 1


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
U21(tt) → tt
U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U311(isNat(N), N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U411(isNat(M), M, N)
U411(tt, M, N) → U421(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 6 less nodes.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U111(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U111(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( ISNAT(x1) ) = max{0, 2x1 - 1}

POL( U111(x1, x2) ) = 2x2 + 1

POL( activate(x1) ) = x1

POL( n__0 ) = 2

POL( 0 ) = 2

POL( n__plus(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + x2 + 2

POL( plus(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + x2 + 2

POL( U31(x1, x2) ) = x2 + 2

POL( isNat(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( tt ) = 2

POL( n__s(x1) ) = 2

POL( s(x1) ) = 2

POL( U11(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 2x2 + 2

POL( U12(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( U21(x1) ) = 2

POL( U41(x1, ..., x3) ) = 2x3 + 2

POL( U42(x1, ..., x3) ) = x1


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
U21(tt) → tt
U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(12) YES