(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a__f(g(X), Y) → a__f(mark(X), f(g(X), Y))
mark(f(X1, X2)) → a__f(mark(X1), X2)
mark(g(X)) → g(mark(X))
a__f(X1, X2) → f(X1, X2)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
A__F(g(X), Y) → A__F(mark(X), f(g(X), Y))
A__F(g(X), Y) → MARK(X)
MARK(f(X1, X2)) → A__F(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(f(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(g(X)) → MARK(X)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a__f(g(X), Y) → a__f(mark(X), f(g(X), Y))
mark(f(X1, X2)) → a__f(mark(X1), X2)
mark(g(X)) → g(mark(X))
a__f(X1, X2) → f(X1, X2)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
A__F(g(X), Y) → A__F(mark(X), f(g(X), Y))
A__F(g(X), Y) → MARK(X)
MARK(f(X1, X2)) → A__F(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(f(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(g(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
| POL( A__F(x1, x2) ) = x1 + 1 |
| POL( f(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 1 |
| POL( a__f(x1, x2) ) = 2x1 + 2 |
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:
mark(f(X1, X2)) → a__f(mark(X1), X2)
mark(g(X)) → g(mark(X))
a__f(X1, X2) → f(X1, X2)
a__f(g(X), Y) → a__f(mark(X), f(g(X), Y))
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
a__f(g(X), Y) → a__f(mark(X), f(g(X), Y))
mark(f(X1, X2)) → a__f(mark(X1), X2)
mark(g(X)) → g(mark(X))
a__f(X1, X2) → f(X1, X2)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(6) YES