YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Transformed_CSR_04_Ex26_Luc03b_iGM.ari

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳9 YES
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳14 YES
    ↳15 QDP
        ↳16 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳19 YES
    ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳24 YES
    ↳25 QDP
        ↳26 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳27 QDP
        ↳28 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳29 YES
    ↳30 QDP
        ↳31 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳32 QDP
        ↳33 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳34 YES
    ↳35 QDP
        ↳36 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳37 QDP
        ↳38 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳39 YES
    ↳40 QDP
        ↳41 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳42 QDP
        ↳43 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳44 YES
    ↳45 QDP
        ↳46 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 81 ms)
        ↳47 QDP
        ↳48 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 40 ms)
        ↳49 QDP
        ↳50 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 66 ms)
        ↳51 QDP
        ↳52 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 70 ms)
        ↳53 QDP
        ↳54 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 16 ms)
        ↳55 QDP
        ↳56 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳57 QDP
        ↳58 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳59 QDP
        ↳60 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳61 YES

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → CONS(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → RECIP(sqr(N))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → SQR(N)
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → TERMS(s(N))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → S(N)
ACTIVE(sqr(0)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → S(add(sqr(X), dbl(X)))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → ADD(sqr(X), dbl(X))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → SQR(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → DBL(X)
ACTIVE(dbl(0)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → S(s(dbl(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → S(dbl(X))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → DBL(X)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(first(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
MARK(terms(X)) → TERMS(mark(X))
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → RECIP(mark(X))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → SQR(mark(X))
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → DBL(mark(X))
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)
TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 9 SCCs with 28 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • DBL(active(X)) → DBL(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • DBL(mark(X)) → DBL(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(14) YES

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(19) YES

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • S(active(X)) → S(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • S(mark(X)) → S(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(24) YES

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • SQR(active(X)) → SQR(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • SQR(mark(X)) → SQR(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(29) YES

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • RECIP(active(X)) → RECIP(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • RECIP(mark(X)) → RECIP(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(34) YES

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(39) YES

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • TERMS(active(X)) → TERMS(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • TERMS(mark(X)) → TERMS(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(44) YES

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
terms(x1)  =  x1
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
recip(x1)  =  x1
sqr(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s
dbl(x1)  =  x1
add(x1, x2)  =  add(x1, x2)
0  =  0
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x1, x2)
active(x1)  =  x1
nil  =  nil

Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:
trivial

and weight map:

s=2
0=4
first_2=2
add_2=1
nil=5

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)

(47) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(48) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(dbl(s(X))) → MARK(s(s(dbl(X))))
MARK(dbl(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
terms(x1)  =  x1
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  x1
recip(x1)  =  x1
sqr(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s
dbl(x1)  =  dbl(x1)
add(x1, x2)  =  x2
first(x1, x2)  =  first(x2)
active(x1)  =  x1
0  =  0
nil  =  nil

Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:
trivial

and weight map:

s=1
0=2
first_1=2
dbl_1=1
nil=2

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)

(49) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(terms(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(sqr(s(X))) → MARK(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(sqr(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( ACTIVE(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( add(x1, x2) ) = 2x2 + 2

POL( cons(x1, x2) ) = x1 + 1

POL( dbl(x1) ) = 1

POL( first(x1, x2) ) = 2x2

POL( recip(x1) ) = x1

POL( sqr(x1) ) = x1 + 1

POL( terms(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( mark(x1) ) = x1

POL( active(x1) ) = x1

POL( s(x1) ) = 0

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( nil ) = 0

POL( MARK(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)

(51) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(52) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(dbl(X)) → ACTIVE(dbl(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( ACTIVE(x1) ) = max{0, x1 - 1}

POL( add(x1, x2) ) = 2

POL( cons(x1, x2) ) = 2

POL( dbl(x1) ) = 1

POL( first(x1, x2) ) = 2

POL( recip(x1) ) = 2

POL( sqr(x1) ) = 2

POL( terms(x1) ) = 2

POL( mark(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( active(x1) ) = max{0, 2x1 - 2}

POL( s(x1) ) = 1

POL( 0 ) = 1

POL( nil ) = 0

POL( MARK(x1) ) = 1


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

(53) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(54) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(terms(N)) → MARK(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  x1
terms(x1)  =  terms
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons
recip(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  x1
sqr(x1)  =  sqr
add(x1, x2)  =  x2
first(x1, x2)  =  first
active(x1)  =  x1
s(x1)  =  s
dbl(x1)  =  dbl
0  =  0
nil  =  nil

Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:
trivial

and weight map:

s=1
sqr=3
terms=4
dbl=3
0=2
cons=3
first=5
nil=3

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)

(55) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(terms(X)) → ACTIVE(terms(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(recip(X)) → ACTIVE(recip(mark(X)))
MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(sqr(X)) → ACTIVE(sqr(mark(X)))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(56) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 6 less nodes.

(57) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(terms(N)) → mark(cons(recip(sqr(N)), terms(s(N))))
active(sqr(0)) → mark(0)
active(sqr(s(X))) → mark(s(add(sqr(X), dbl(X))))
active(dbl(0)) → mark(0)
active(dbl(s(X))) → mark(s(s(dbl(X))))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(terms(X)) → active(terms(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(recip(X)) → active(recip(mark(X)))
mark(sqr(X)) → active(sqr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(dbl(X)) → active(dbl(mark(X)))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
terms(mark(X)) → terms(X)
terms(active(X)) → terms(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
recip(mark(X)) → recip(X)
recip(active(X)) → recip(X)
sqr(mark(X)) → sqr(X)
sqr(active(X)) → sqr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
dbl(mark(X)) → dbl(X)
dbl(active(X)) → dbl(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(58) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(59) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(60) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • MARK(recip(X)) → MARK(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(61) YES