Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Transformed_CSR_04_Ex1_GL02a

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳9 YES

    ↳10 QDP

        ↳11 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳14 YES

    ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳17 QDP

        ↳18 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳19 YES

    ↳20 QDP

        ↳21 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳22 QDP

        ↳23 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳24 YES

    ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳27 QDP

        ↳28 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳29 YES

    ↳30 QDP

        ↳31 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳32 QDP

        ↳33 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳34 YES

    ↳35 QDP

        ↳36 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 106 ms)

        ↳37 QDP

        ↳38 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 100 ms)

        ↳39 QDP

        ↳40 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 23 ms)

        ↳41 QDP

        ↳42 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 47 ms)

        ↳43 QDP

        ↳44 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳45 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(0, 0)) → MARK(true)
ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → EQ(X, Y)
ACTIVE(eq(X, Y)) → MARK(false)
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → CONS(X, inf(s(X)))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → INF(s(X))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(take(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → CONS(Y, take(X, L))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → TAKE(X, L)
ACTIVE(length(nil)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → S(length(L))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → LENGTH(L)
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
MARK(inf(X)) → INF(mark(X))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → LENGTH(mark(X))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)
INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 19 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(14) YES

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(19) YES

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

INF(active(X)) → INF(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
INF(mark(X)) → INF(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(24) YES

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(29) YES

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

EQ(X1, mark(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
EQ(mark(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
EQ(active(X1), X2) → EQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
EQ(X1, active(X2)) → EQ(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(34) YES

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → MARK(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, L))) → MARK(s(length(L)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = x1
eq(x1, x2) = eq
MARK(x1) = x1
inf(x1) = x1
cons(x1, x2) = cons
s(x1) = s
take(x1, x2) = take(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = x1
length(x1) = length(x1)
active(x1) = x1
0 = 0
true = true
false = false
nil = nil

Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:

trivial

and weight map:

s=5
true=5
eq=7
length_1=4
take_2=3
0=8
cons=3
false=5
nil=8

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(inf(X)) → MARK(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
MARK(inf(X)) → ACTIVE(inf(mark(X)))
MARK(inf(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:

POL( ACTIVE(x₁) ) = x₁

POL( MARK(x₁) ) = 2x₁

POL( eq(x₁, x₂) ) = x₁ + x₂

POL( mark(x₁) ) = 2x₁ + 1

POL( active(x₁) ) = x₁ + 1

POL( cons(x₁, x₂) ) = max{0, -2}

POL( inf(x₁) ) = x₁ + 2

POL( s(x₁) ) = 2x₁

POL( length(x₁) ) = 0

POL( take(x₁, x₂) ) = x₂ + 1

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( true ) = 0

POL( false ) = 0

POL( nil ) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)

(39) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(40) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:

POL( ACTIVE(x₁) ) = max{0, x₁ - 2}

POL( MARK(x₁) ) = max{0, x₁ - 1}

POL( eq(x₁, x₂) ) = 0

POL( mark(x₁) ) = x₁

POL( active(x₁) ) = x₁

POL( s(x₁) ) = 0

POL( cons(x₁, x₂) ) = 2

POL( length(x₁) ) = 1

POL( take(x₁, x₂) ) = 2x₂ + 1

POL( inf(x₁) ) = 2

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( true ) = 0

POL( false ) = 0

POL( nil ) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))
MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → MARK(eq(X, Y))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = x1
eq(x1, x2) = x2
s(x1) = s(x1)
MARK(x1) = x1
take(x1, x2) = take
length(x1) = length
mark(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1

Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:

trivial

and weight map:

s_1=1
length=1
take=2

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(eq(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(eq(X1, X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(eq(0, 0)) → mark(true)
active(eq(s(X), s(Y))) → mark(eq(X, Y))
active(eq(X, Y)) → mark(false)
active(inf(X)) → mark(cons(X, inf(s(X))))
active(take(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(X), cons(Y, L))) → mark(cons(Y, take(X, L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, L))) → mark(s(length(L)))
mark(eq(X1, X2)) → active(eq(X1, X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(inf(X)) → active(inf(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
eq(mark(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, mark(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(active(X1), X2) → eq(X1, X2)
eq(X1, active(X2)) → eq(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
inf(mark(X)) → inf(X)
inf(active(X)) → inf(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) YES

(15) Obligation:

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) YES

(20) Obligation:

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) Obligation:

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(24) YES

(25) Obligation:

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) YES

(30) Obligation:

(31) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

(33) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(34) YES

(35) Obligation:

(36) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(37) Obligation:

(38) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(39) Obligation:

(40) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(41) Obligation:

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(43) Obligation:

(44) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(45) TRUE