Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Transformed_CSR_04_Ex15_Luc98

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳9 YES

    ↳10 QDP

        ↳11 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳14 YES

    ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳17 QDP

        ↳18 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳19 YES

    ↳20 QDP

        ↳21 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳22 QDP

        ↳23 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳24 YES

    ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳27 QDP

        ↳28 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳29 YES

    ↳30 QDP

        ↳31 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳32 QDP

        ↳33 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳34 YES

    ↳35 QDP

        ↳36 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳37 QDP

        ↳38 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳39 YES

    ↳40 QDP

        ↳41 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 29 ms)

        ↳42 QDP

        ↳43 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳44 QDP

        ↳45 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 15 ms)

        ↳46 QDP

        ↳47 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 8 ms)

        ↳48 QDP

        ↳49 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳50 QDP

        ↳51 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 13 ms)

        ↳52 QDP

        ↳53 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 12 ms)

        ↳54 QDP

        ↳55 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 9 ms)

        ↳56 QDP

        ↳57 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 1 ms)

        ↳58 QDP

        ↳59 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳60 QDP

        ↳61 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳62 QDP

        ↳63 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳64 QDP

        ↳65 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳66 QDP

        ↳67 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳68 YES

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(and(false, Y)) → MARK(false)
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → S(add(X, Y))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → ADD(X, Y)
ACTIVE(first(0, X)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(true) → ACTIVE(true)
MARK(false) → ACTIVE(false)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → IF(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ADD(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 8 SCCs with 17 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(14) YES

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
FIRST(active(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
FIRST(X1, active(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(19) YES

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(24) YES

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ADD(X1, mark(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
ADD(mark(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
ADD(active(X1), X2) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
ADD(X1, active(X2)) → ADD(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(29) YES

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

IF(X1, mark(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
IF(mark(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3
IF(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3
IF(active(X1), X2, X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2, 3 >= 3
IF(X1, active(X2), X3) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
IF(X1, X2, active(X3)) → IF(X1, X2, X3)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3

(34) YES

(35) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(36) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(37) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(38) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(39) YES

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(X))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(from(x₁)) = 1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → MARK(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(from(x₁)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(add(0, X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

(48) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(49) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(add(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

(50) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(51) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(and(true, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

(52) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(53) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)

(54) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(55) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 1
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(from(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)

(56) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(57) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 0
POL(active(x₁)) = 0
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 1
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 0
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)

(58) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(59) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(if(true, X, Y)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 0
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(true) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)

(60) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(61) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(add(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(add(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(active(x₁)) = x₁
POL(add(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(false) = 1
POL(first(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(from(x₁)) = 0
POL(if(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(s(x₁)) = 1
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)

(62) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(if(false, X, Y)) → MARK(Y)
ACTIVE(add(s(X), Y)) → MARK(s(add(X, Y)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(63) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

(64) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(and(true, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(false, Y)) → mark(false)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(add(0, X)) → mark(X)
active(add(s(X), Y)) → mark(s(add(X, Y)))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(true) → active(true)
mark(false) → active(false)
mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) → active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(add(X1, X2)) → active(add(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(X))
mark(first(X1, X2)) → active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(X1, X2))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(X))
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, mark(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(active(X1), X2, X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, active(X2), X3) → if(X1, X2, X3)
if(X1, X2, active(X3)) → if(X1, X2, X3)
add(mark(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, mark(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
add(active(X1), X2) → add(X1, X2)
add(X1, active(X2)) → add(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
first(mark(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, mark(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
first(active(X1), X2) → first(X1, X2)
first(X1, active(X2)) → first(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(65) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(66) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(67) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

MARK(if(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) YES

(15) Obligation:

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) YES

(20) Obligation:

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) Obligation:

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(24) YES

(25) Obligation:

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) YES

(30) Obligation:

(31) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

(33) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(34) YES

(35) Obligation:

(36) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(37) Obligation:

(38) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(39) YES

(40) Obligation:

(41) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(42) Obligation:

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(44) Obligation:

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(46) Obligation:

(47) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(48) Obligation:

(49) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(50) Obligation:

(51) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(52) Obligation:

(53) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(54) Obligation:

(55) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(56) Obligation:

(57) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(58) Obligation:

(59) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(60) Obligation:

(61) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(62) Obligation:

(63) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(64) Obligation:

(65) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(66) Obligation:

(67) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(68) YES