YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Transformed_CSR_04_Ex14_AEGL02_iGM.ari

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳9 YES
    ↳10 QDP
        ↳11 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳14 YES
    ↳15 QDP
        ↳16 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳17 QDP
        ↳18 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳19 YES
    ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳24 YES
    ↳25 QDP
        ↳26 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳27 QDP
        ↳28 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳29 YES
    ↳30 QDP
        ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 54 ms)
        ↳32 QDP
        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 46 ms)
        ↳34 QDP
        ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 29 ms)
        ↳36 QDP
        ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 14 ms)
        ↳38 QDP
        ↳39 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳40 QDP
        ↳41 UsableRulesReductionPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳42 QDP
        ↳43 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳44 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(length(nil)) → MARK(0)
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → S(length1(Y))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → LENGTH1(Y)
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → LENGTH(X)
MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
MARK(from(X)) → FROM(mark(X))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 6 SCCs with 12 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • LENGTH1(active(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • LENGTH1(mark(X)) → LENGTH1(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(9) YES

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(14) YES

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • S(active(X)) → S(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • S(mark(X)) → S(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(19) YES

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

  • CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

  • CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2

(24) YES

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • FROM(active(X)) → FROM(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

  • FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(29) YES

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(from(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( ACTIVE(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( cons(x1, x2) ) = x1 + 2

POL( from(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( s(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( mark(x1) ) = x1

POL( active(x1) ) = x1

POL( length(x1) ) = 0

POL( length1(x1) ) = 0

POL( nil ) = 2

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( MARK(x1) ) = x1 + 2


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1)  =  MARK
from(x1)  =  from
ACTIVE(x1)  =  x1
mark(x1)  =  mark
cons(x1, x2)  =  cons
s(x1)  =  s
length(x1)  =  length
length1(x1)  =  length1
active(x1)  =  active
nil  =  nil
0  =  0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[mark, nil, 0] > [MARK, from, length, length1] > active > cons
[mark, nil, 0] > [MARK, from, length, length1] > active > s

Status:
MARK: multiset
from: multiset
mark: multiset
cons: []
s: []
length: multiset
length1: multiset
active: multiset
nil: multiset
0: multiset


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(from(X)) → ACTIVE(from(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( ACTIVE(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( from(x1) ) = x1 + 2

POL( mark(x1) ) = x1

POL( active(x1) ) = x1

POL( cons(x1, x2) ) = 1

POL( s(x1) ) = x1

POL( length(x1) ) = 0

POL( length1(x1) ) = 0

POL( nil ) = 1

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( MARK(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(from(X)) → MARK(cons(X, from(s(X))))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:
POL( MARK(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( s(x1) ) = x1

POL( active(x1) ) = x1

POL( mark(x1) ) = 2x1

POL( cons(x1, x2) ) = max{0, -2}

POL( from(x1) ) = 2x1 + 2

POL( ACTIVE(x1) ) = x1 + 1

POL( length1(x1) ) = 1

POL( length(x1) ) = 1


The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(X, Y))) → mark(s(length1(Y)))
active(length1(X)) → mark(length(X))
mark(from(X)) → active(from(mark(X)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(X))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length1(X)) → active(length1(X))
from(mark(X)) → from(X)
from(active(X)) → from(X)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length1(active(X)) → length1(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

length1(active(X)) → length1(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) UsableRulesReductionPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

ACTIVE(length(cons(X, Y))) → MARK(s(length1(Y)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
The following rules are removed from R:

length1(active(X)) → length1(X)
length1(mark(X)) → length1(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(active(x1)) = x1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + 2·x2   
POL(length(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(length1(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1   

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(length1(X)) → MARK(length(X))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(X))
MARK(length1(X)) → ACTIVE(length1(X))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(44) TRUE