Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Strategy_removed_AG01

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 Overlay + Local Confluence (⇔, 0 ms)

↳2 QTRS

↳3 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳4 QDP

↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳6 AND

    ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳13 YES

    ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳16 QDP

        ↳17 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳18 QDP

        ↳19 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳20 YES

    ↳21 QDP

        ↳22 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳23 QDP

        ↳24 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳27 YES

    ↳28 QDP

        ↳29 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳30 QDP

        ↳31 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳32 QDP

        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 20 ms)

        ↳34 QDP

        ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 7 ms)

        ↳36 QDP

        ↳37 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳38 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVEN(s(s(x))) → EVEN(x)
HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)
PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
TIMES(s(x), y) → IF_TIMES(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
TIMES(s(x), y) → EVEN(s(x))
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → PLUS(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → TIMES(half(s(x)), y)
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → HALF(s(x))
IF_TIMES(false, s(x), y) → PLUS(y, times(x, y))
IF_TIMES(false, s(x), y) → TIMES(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

HALF(s(s(x))) → HALF(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(20) YES

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVEN(s(s(x))) → EVEN(x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVEN(s(s(x))) → EVEN(x)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVEN(s(s(x))) → EVEN(x)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

EVEN(s(s(x))) → EVEN(x)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(27) YES

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(s(x), y) → IF_TIMES(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → TIMES(half(s(x)), y)
IF_TIMES(false, s(x), y) → TIMES(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

even(0) → true
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(0) → 0
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(s(x), y) → if_times(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
if_times(true, s(x), y) → plus(times(half(s(x)), y), times(half(s(x)), y))
if_times(false, s(x), y) → plus(y, times(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(s(x), y) → IF_TIMES(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → TIMES(half(s(x)), y)
IF_TIMES(false, s(x), y) → TIMES(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
even(0) → true

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))
plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

plus(0, x0)
plus(s(x0), x1)
times(0, x0)
times(s(x0), x1)
if_times(true, s(x0), x1)
if_times(false, s(x0), x1)

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(s(x), y) → IF_TIMES(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → TIMES(half(s(x)), y)
IF_TIMES(false, s(x), y) → TIMES(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
even(0) → true

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF_TIMES(false, s(x), y) → TIMES(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TIMES(x1, x2) = TIMES(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
IF_TIMES(x1, x2, x3) = IF_TIMES(x2)
even(x1) = even
true = true
half(x1) = x1
false = false
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[s₁, even] > [TIMES₁, IF_TIMES₁]
[s₁, even] > true
[false, 0] > [TIMES₁, IF_TIMES₁]
[false, 0] > true

Status:

TIMES₁: [1]
s₁: [1]
IF_TIMES₁: [1]
even: []
true: multiset
false: multiset
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(s(x), y) → IF_TIMES(even(s(x)), s(x), y)
IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → TIMES(half(s(x)), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
even(0) → true

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF_TIMES(true, s(x), y) → TIMES(half(s(x)), y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:

POL( IF_TIMES(x₁, ..., x₃) ) = max{0, x₁ + x₂ - 1}

POL( even(x₁) ) = 0

POL( s(x₁) ) = 2x₁ + 2

POL( 0 ) = 0

POL( false ) = 0

POL( TIMES(x₁, x₂) ) = max{0, x₁ - 1}

POL( half(x₁) ) = max{0, x₁ - 2}

POL( true ) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0
even(0) → true

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(s(x), y) → IF_TIMES(even(s(x)), s(x), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

half(s(s(x))) → s(half(x))
half(0) → 0
even(s(0)) → false
even(s(s(x))) → even(x)
even(0) → true

The set Q consists of the following terms:

even(0)
even(s(0))
even(s(s(x0)))
half(0)
half(s(s(x0)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(0) Obligation:

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) Obligation:

(19) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) YES

(21) Obligation:

(22) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) Obligation:

(24) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) Obligation:

(26) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) YES

(28) Obligation:

(29) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(30) Obligation:

(31) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(34) Obligation:

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(36) Obligation:

(37) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(38) TRUE