YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of SK90_2.53.ari

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, y) → g(x, y)
g(h(x), y) → h(f(x, y))
g(h(x), y) → h(g(x, y))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:
f2 > g2 > h1

and weight map:

h_1=1
f_2=0
g_2=0

The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

f(x, y) → g(x, y)
g(h(x), y) → h(f(x, y))
g(h(x), y) → h(g(x, y))


(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(3) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(4) YES