YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of SK90_2.33.ari

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

or(x, x) → x
and(x, x) → x
not(not(x)) → x
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(x), not(y))

Q is empty.

(1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(and(x1, x2)) = 2 + 2·x1 + x2   
POL(not(x1)) = 2·x1   
POL(or(x1, x2)) = 2 + 2·x1 + x2   
With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

or(x, x) → x
and(x, x) → x
not(and(x, y)) → or(not(x), not(y))
not(or(x, y)) → and(not(x), not(y))


(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

not(not(x)) → x

Q is empty.

(3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Used ordering:
Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:
trivial

and weight map:

not_1=1

The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly:

not(not(x)) → x


(4) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

(5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.

(6) YES