YES Termination w.r.t. Q proof of Beerendonk_07_23.ari

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 AAECC Innermost (⇔, 0 ms)
↳2 QTRS
↳3 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳4 QDP
↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)
↳6 AND
    ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳9 QDP
        ↳10 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳11 QDP
        ↳12 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳13 YES
    ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳16 QDP
        ↳17 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳18 QDP
        ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 59 ms)
        ↳20 QDP
        ↳21 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳22 QDP
        ↳23 PisEmptyProof (⇔, 0 ms)
        ↳24 YES

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cond1(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
cond2(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
cond2(false, x, y, z) → cond1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

Q is empty.

(1) AAECC Innermost (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We have applied [NOC,AAECCNOC] to switch to innermost. The TRS R 1 is

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The TRS R 2 is

cond1(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
cond2(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
cond2(false, x, y, z) → cond1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)

The signature Sigma is {cond1, cond2}

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cond1(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
cond2(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
cond2(false, x, y, z) → cond1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND1(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
COND1(true, x, y, z) → GR(y, z)
COND2(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
COND2(true, x, y, z) → GR(y, z)
COND2(true, x, y, z) → P(y)
COND2(false, x, y, z) → COND1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
COND2(false, x, y, z) → GR(x, z)
COND2(false, x, y, z) → P(x)
GR(s(x), s(y)) → GR(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cond1(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
cond2(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
cond2(false, x, y, z) → cond1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 5 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GR(s(x), s(y)) → GR(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cond1(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
cond2(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
cond2(false, x, y, z) → cond1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GR(s(x), s(y)) → GR(x, y)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GR(s(x), s(y)) → GR(x, y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • GR(s(x), s(y)) → GR(x, y)
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND2(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
COND2(false, x, y, z) → COND1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
COND1(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cond1(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
cond2(true, x, y, z) → cond2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
cond2(false, x, y, z) → cond1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND2(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
COND2(false, x, y, z) → COND1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
COND1(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)
gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

cond1(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(true, x0, x1, x2)
cond2(false, x0, x1, x2)

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND2(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
COND2(false, x, y, z) → COND1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
COND1(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


COND2(false, x, y, z) → COND1(gr(x, z), p(x), y, z)
COND1(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO,RATPOLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(COND1(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = [2] + [4]x1 + [2]x2 + [2]x4   
POL(COND2(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = [4] + [2]x2 + [2]x4   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(gr(x1, x2)) = [1/4]x1   
POL(p(x1)) = [1/4]x1   
POL(s(x1)) = [4] + [4]x1   
POL(true) = [1]   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND2(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


COND2(true, x, y, z) → COND2(gr(y, z), x, p(y), z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO,RATPOLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(COND2(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = [1/4]x1 + [1/2]x3   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(gr(x1, x2)) = [1/4]x1   
POL(p(x1)) = [1/4]x1   
POL(s(x1)) = [1] + [4]x1   
POL(true) = [1/4]   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gr(0, x0)
gr(s(x0), 0)
gr(s(x0), s(x1))
p(0)
p(s(x0))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(24) YES