Termination w.r.t. Q proof of AG01

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 Overlay + Local Confluence (⇔, 0 ms)

↳2 QTRS

↳3 DependencyPairsProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳4 QDP

↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

↳6 AND

    ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳13 YES

    ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳16 QDP

        ↳17 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳18 QDP

        ↳19 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳20 YES

    ↳21 QDP

        ↳22 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳23 QDP

        ↳24 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔, 32 ms)

        ↳27 QDP

        ↳28 DependencyGraphProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳29 QDP

        ↳30 UsableRulesProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳31 QDP

        ↳32 QReductionProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳33 QDP

        ↳34 QDPSizeChangeProof (⇔, 0 ms)

        ↳35 YES

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
or(true, y) → true
or(false, y) → y
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) → false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → true
if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

Q is empty.

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost.

(2) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
or(true, y) → true
or(false, y) → y
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) → false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → true
if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)
UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) → UNION(i, h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → EQ(x, u)
IF_REACH_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → EQ(y, v)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → OR(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → UNION(i, h)
IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
or(true, y) → true
or(false, y) → y
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) → false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → true
if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) → UNION(i, h)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
or(true, y) → true
or(false, y) → y
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) → false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → true
if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) → UNION(i, h)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) → UNION(i, h)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

UNION(edge(x, y, i), h) → UNION(i, h)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
or(true, y) → true
or(false, y) → y
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) → false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → true
if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

EQ(s(x), s(y)) → EQ(x, y)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(20) YES

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
or(true, y) → true
or(false, y) → y
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
reach(x, y, empty, h) → false
reach(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → if_reach_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
if_reach_2(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → true
if_reach_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → or(reach(x, y, i, h), reach(v, y, union(i, h), empty))
if_reach_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → reach(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

or(true, x0)
or(false, x0)
reach(x0, x1, empty, x2)
reach(x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(true, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_2(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)
if_reach_1(false, x0, x1, edge(x2, x3, x4), x5)

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

IF_REACH_1(true, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_2(eq(y, v), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation:

POL( IF_REACH_1(x₁, ..., x₅) ) = 2x₁ + 2x₄ + 2x₅ + 2

POL( IF_REACH_2(x₁, ..., x₅) ) = 2x₄ + 2x₅

POL( eq(x₁, x₂) ) = 0

POL( 0 ) = 2

POL( true ) = 0

POL( s(x₁) ) = x₁ + 2

POL( false ) = 0

POL( REACH(x₁, ..., x₄) ) = 2x₃ + 2x₄ + 2

POL( union(x₁, x₂) ) = x₁ + x₂

POL( empty ) = 0

POL( edge(x₁, ..., x₃) ) = x₃ + 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)
union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, h)
IF_REACH_2(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(v, y, union(i, h), empty)
IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

union(empty, h) → h
union(edge(x, y, i), h) → edge(x, y, union(i, h))
eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))
union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

union(empty, x0)
union(edge(x0, x1, x2), x3)

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

eq(0, 0) → true
eq(0, s(x)) → false
eq(s(x), 0) → false
eq(s(x), s(y)) → eq(x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

eq(0, 0)
eq(0, s(x0))
eq(s(x0), 0)
eq(s(x0), s(x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

REACH(x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → IF_REACH_1(eq(x, u), x, y, edge(u, v, i), h)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 2, 2 >= 3, 3 >= 4, 4 >= 5
IF_REACH_1(false, x, y, edge(u, v, i), h) → REACH(x, y, i, edge(u, v, h))
The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 1, 3 >= 2, 4 > 3

(0) Obligation:

(1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) YES

(14) Obligation:

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) Obligation:

(19) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) YES

(21) Obligation:

(22) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) Obligation:

(24) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) Obligation:

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) Obligation:

(30) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(31) Obligation:

(32) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(33) Obligation:

(34) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(35) YES