YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(x,f(a(),f(f(a(),a()),a())))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(x,f(a(),f(f(a(),a()),a())))
p2: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),f(f(a(),a()),a()))
p3: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(f(a(),a()),a())
p4: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(a(),a())

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(x,f(a(),f(f(a(),a()),a())))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f#(x,f(a(),f(f(a(),a()),a())))

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),f(a(),x)) -> f(x,f(a(),f(f(a(),a()),a())))

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^3
      order: lexicographic order
      interpretations:
        f#_A(x1,x2) = ((0,0,0),(0,0,0),(1,0,0)) x1 + ((0,0,0),(1,0,0),(0,1,0)) x2
        a_A() = (2,1,0)
        f_A(x1,x2) = ((0,0,0),(0,0,0),(1,0,0)) x1 + ((0,0,0),(1,0,0),(0,0,0)) x2 + (1,1,0)
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        a > f# > f
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(f#) = []
        pi(a) = []
        pi(f) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.