YES

We show the termination of the TRS R:

  f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b())
  f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c())
  f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c())
  f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a())

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),a()) -> f#(a(),b())
p2: f#(a(),b()) -> f#(s(a()),c())
p3: f#(s(X),c()) -> f#(X,c())
p4: f#(c(),c()) -> f#(a(),a())

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b())
r2: f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c())
r3: f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c())
r4: f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p1, p2, p3, p4}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),a()) -> f#(a(),b())
p2: f#(a(),b()) -> f#(s(a()),c())
p3: f#(s(X),c()) -> f#(X,c())
p4: f#(c(),c()) -> f#(a(),a())

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b())
r2: f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c())
r3: f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c())
r4: f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a())

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^3
      order: lexicographic order
      interpretations:
        f#_A(x1,x2) = ((0,0,0),(1,0,0),(0,0,0)) x1
        a_A() = (2,1,1)
        b_A() = (1,1,1)
        s_A(x1) = x1 + (0,1,1)
        c_A() = (3,1,1)
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        b > s > c > f# > a
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(f#) = []
        pi(a) = []
        pi(b) = []
        pi(s) = []
        pi(c) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p4

We remove them from the problem.

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(a(),a()) -> f#(a(),b())
p2: f#(a(),b()) -> f#(s(a()),c())
p3: f#(s(X),c()) -> f#(X,c())

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b())
r2: f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c())
r3: f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c())
r4: f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a())

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p3}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: f#(s(X),c()) -> f#(X,c())

and R consists of:

r1: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b())
r2: f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c())
r3: f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c())
r4: f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a())

The set of usable rules consists of

  (no rules)

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^3
      order: lexicographic order
      interpretations:
        f#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0),(1,1,0),(0,0,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,1,1)) x2
        s_A(x1) = ((1,0,0),(1,1,0),(1,1,1)) x1 + (1,1,1)
        c_A() = (0,0,0)
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        s > c > f#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(f#) = 2
        pi(s) = []
        pi(c) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.