YES

We show the termination of the relative TRS R/S:

  R:
  le(|0|(),y) -> true()
  le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
  le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
  minus(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  minus(s(x),y) -> if_minus(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)
  if_minus(true(),s(x),y) -> |0|()
  if_minus(false(),s(x),y) -> s(minus(x,y))
  mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
  mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
  mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
  if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
  if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)

  S:
  rand(x) -> x
  rand(x) -> rand(s(x))

-- SCC decomposition.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: le#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(x,y)
p2: minus#(s(x),y) -> if_minus#(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)
p3: minus#(s(x),y) -> le#(s(x),y)
p4: if_minus#(false(),s(x),y) -> minus#(x,y)
p5: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
p6: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(y,x)
p7: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p8: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> minus#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: minus(s(x),y) -> if_minus(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)
r6: if_minus(true(),s(x),y) -> |0|()
r7: if_minus(false(),s(x),y) -> s(minus(x,y))
r8: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r10: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r11: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r12: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
r13: rand(x) -> x
r14: rand(x) -> rand(s(x))

The estimated dependency graph contains the following SCCs:

  {p5, p7}
  {p2, p4}
  {p1}


-- Reduction pair.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if_mod#(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod#(minus(x,y),s(y))
p2: mod#(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod#(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: minus(s(x),y) -> if_minus(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)
r6: if_minus(true(),s(x),y) -> |0|()
r7: if_minus(false(),s(x),y) -> s(minus(x,y))
r8: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r10: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r11: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r12: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
r13: rand(x) -> x
r14: rand(x) -> rand(s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^4
      order: lexicographic order
      interpretations:
        if_mod#_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,1,0)) x2 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(0,0,0,1)) x3 + (0,0,4,0)
        true_A() = (1,1,0,1)
        s_A(x1) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(0,0,1,0)) x1 + (0,11,7,0)
        mod#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(1,0,1,0),(0,0,1,1)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(1,0,0,1)) x2 + (0,10,0,4)
        minus_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(1,0,1,0)) x1 + ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x2 + (0,1,2,1)
        le_A(x1,x2) = ((0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0)) x2 + (9,2,1,2)
        |0|_A() = (0,12,1,0)
        false_A() = (1,1,14,16)
        if_minus_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(0,0,0,1)) x2 + ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0)) x3 + (0,1,0,0)
        mod_A(x1,x2) = x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(1,1,0,1)) x2 + (1,1,0,12)
        if_mod_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,0,1)) x2 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(0,1,0,1)) x3 + (1,0,0,0)
        rand_A(x1) = x1 + (1,0,1,1)
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        rand > le > if_mod > false > true > if_mod# > minus > if_minus > s > mod > |0| > mod#
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(if_mod#) = 3
        pi(true) = []
        pi(s) = []
        pi(mod#) = 2
        pi(minus) = []
        pi(le) = []
        pi(|0|) = []
        pi(false) = []
        pi(if_minus) = [2]
        pi(mod) = 2
        pi(if_mod) = 2
        pi(rand) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: if_minus#(false(),s(x),y) -> minus#(x,y)
p2: minus#(s(x),y) -> if_minus#(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: minus(s(x),y) -> if_minus(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)
r6: if_minus(true(),s(x),y) -> |0|()
r7: if_minus(false(),s(x),y) -> s(minus(x,y))
r8: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r10: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r11: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r12: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
r13: rand(x) -> x
r14: rand(x) -> rand(s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^4
      order: lexicographic order
      interpretations:
        if_minus#_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x1 + x2 + x3 + (0,0,1,0)
        false_A() = (4,1,1,2)
        s_A(x1) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x1 + (0,4,1,6)
        minus#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,0,0,0)) x1 + x2 + (4,5,0,7)
        le_A(x1,x2) = ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0)) x2 + (4,2,2,1)
        |0|_A() = (0,0,0,1)
        true_A() = (1,1,3,2)
        minus_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(1,1,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x1 + ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x2 + (0,1,0,2)
        if_minus_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,1,0)) x2 + ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,1,0,0)) x3 + (0,1,2,0)
        mod_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(0,0,1,1)) x2 + (1,1,1,11)
        if_mod_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,1,0)) x2 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(1,1,1,1)) x3 + (1,0,2,0)
        rand_A(x1) = x1 + (1,0,1,1)
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        if_mod > false > if_minus# > minus# > le > true > minus > if_minus > s > |0| > rand > mod
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(if_minus#) = 3
        pi(false) = []
        pi(s) = []
        pi(minus#) = 2
        pi(le) = []
        pi(|0|) = []
        pi(true) = []
        pi(minus) = []
        pi(if_minus) = []
        pi(mod) = 2
        pi(if_mod) = 3
        pi(rand) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1, p2

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.

-- Reduction pair.

Consider the non-minimal dependency pair problem (P, R), where P consists of

p1: le#(s(x),s(y)) -> le#(x,y)

and R consists of:

r1: le(|0|(),y) -> true()
r2: le(s(x),|0|()) -> false()
r3: le(s(x),s(y)) -> le(x,y)
r4: minus(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r5: minus(s(x),y) -> if_minus(le(s(x),y),s(x),y)
r6: if_minus(true(),s(x),y) -> |0|()
r7: if_minus(false(),s(x),y) -> s(minus(x,y))
r8: mod(|0|(),y) -> |0|()
r9: mod(s(x),|0|()) -> |0|()
r10: mod(s(x),s(y)) -> if_mod(le(y,x),s(x),s(y))
r11: if_mod(true(),s(x),s(y)) -> mod(minus(x,y),s(y))
r12: if_mod(false(),s(x),s(y)) -> s(x)
r13: rand(x) -> x
r14: rand(x) -> rand(s(x))

The set of usable rules consists of

  r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14

Take the reduction pair:

  lexicographic combination of reduction pairs:
  
    1. matrix interpretations:
    
      carrier: N^4
      order: lexicographic order
      interpretations:
        le#_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(0,1,1,1)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(0,1,1,0)) x2
        s_A(x1) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(1,1,0,1)) x1 + (0,3,3,2)
        le_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(0,1,0,1)) x2 + (2,1,2,1)
        |0|_A() = (0,1,1,1)
        true_A() = (1,1,1,0)
        false_A() = (1,1,1,0)
        minus_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(1,1,1,0),(1,0,0,1)) x1 + ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0)) x2 + (0,1,1,0)
        if_minus_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(1,1,1,0),(0,0,0,0)) x2 + ((0,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0),(1,0,0,0),(0,0,0,0)) x3 + (0,1,0,1)
        mod_A(x1,x2) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,1,1)) x1 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,1,1,1)) x2 + (1,1,4,0)
        if_mod_A(x1,x2,x3) = ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,1,1,0),(1,0,0,1)) x2 + ((1,0,0,0),(0,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(0,1,0,1)) x3 + (1,0,0,2)
        rand_A(x1) = x1 + (1,0,1,1)
    
    2. lexicographic path order with precedence:
    
      precedence:
      
        true > rand > s > mod > if_mod > minus > if_minus > |0| > le# > le > false
      
      argument filter:
    
        pi(le#) = 1
        pi(s) = [1]
        pi(le) = 2
        pi(|0|) = []
        pi(true) = []
        pi(false) = []
        pi(minus) = [1]
        pi(if_minus) = []
        pi(mod) = [1]
        pi(if_mod) = 2
        pi(rand) = []
    

The next rules are strictly ordered:

  p1

We remove them from the problem.  Then no dependency pair remains.