YES
Confluence Proof
Confluence Proof
by csi
Input
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
|
h(c,c) |
→ |
h(b,f(b)) |
|
f(h(a,h(c,a))) |
→ |
c |
|
h(c,b) |
→ |
f(a) |
Proof
1 Decreasing Diagrams
1.1 Relative Termination Proof
The duplicating rules (R) terminate relative to the other rules (S).
1.1.1 R is empty
There are no rules in the TRS R. Hence, R/S is relative terminating.
1.2 Rule Labeling
Confluence is proven, because all critical peaks can be joined decreasingly
using the following rule labeling function (rules that are not shown have label 0).
-
h(c,c)→h(b,f(b)) ↦ 0
-
f(h(a,h(c,a)))→c ↦ 0
-
h(c,b)→f(a) ↦ 0
There are no non-trivial critical pairs.
Tool configuration
csi
- version: csi 1.2.5 [hg: unknown]
- strategy:
(if linear then (cr -dup;(( lpo -quasi || (matrix -dim 1 -ib 3 -ob 4 | matrix -dim 2 -ib 2 -ob 2 | matrix -dim 3 -ib 1 -ob 2 | arctic -dim 2 -ib 2 -ob 2) || (if duplicating then fail else (bounds -rt || bounds -rt -qc))[1] || poly -ib 2 -ob 4 -nl2 -heuristic 1 || fail )[5]*);shift -lstar);(rule_labeling | rule_labeling -left)?;decreasing else fail)!