NO
by csi
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a | → | f(f(h(a,c))) |
h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(a,c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) | → | c |
t0 | = | h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(a,c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) |
→1.2.1.1 | h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(f(f(h(a,c))),c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) | |
= | t1 |
t0 | = | h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(a,c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) |
→ε | c | |
= | t1 |
Automaton 1
final states:
{72}
transitions:
h(104,103) | → | 105 |
h(92,87) | → | 93 |
h(82,79) | → | 83 |
h(85,83) | → | 86 |
h(78,77) | → | 79 |
h(98,97) | → | 99 |
h(105,94) | → | 106 |
h(93,86) | → | 94 |
h(99,96) | → | 100 |
h(106,76) | → | 72 |
h(75,73) | → | 76 |
h(89,88) | → | 90 |
h(101,95) | → | 102 |
b | → | 77 |
b | → | 95 |
c | → | 73 |
c | → | 78 |
c | → | 80 |
c | → | 87 |
c | → | 88 |
c | → | 96 |
c | → | 97 |
c | → | 98 |
c | → | 104 |
a | → | 74 |
a | → | 84 |
a | → | 89 |
f(90) | → | 91 |
f(91) | → | 92 |
f(91) | → | 84 |
f(91) | → | 74 |
f(91) | → | 89 |
f(102) | → | 103 |
f(84) | → | 85 |
f(80) | → | 81 |
f(100) | → | 101 |
f(81) | → | 82 |
f(74) | → | 75 |
Automaton 2
final states:
{36}
transitions:
c | → | 36 |
csi